Recherche simple
Zock Manifest
[Manifesto Zock]
Published by the artist in Direkte Kunst, n. 2, 1967. The first edition is dated March 9, 1967 and signed by 'Omo Super' (Muehl) and 'Garth mit extra Fleischkraft' (Wiener), as program of the fictitious organisation Zealous Organization of Candied Knights. In April, it was spread during the Zock Exercises and the Zock-Fest in sparely 100 copies; in 1971, In 1971, the manifesto was published in Munich by Franz Knödel under the title Zock, Aspekte einer Totalrevolution
Author(s): Oswald Wiener|Otto Muehl
Associated movement: Zealous Organization of Candied Knights
Language : German
Medium : Leaflet | Periodical Press
Original edition of the manifesto: Published by the artist in Direkte Kunst, n. 2, 1967. The first edition is dated March 9, 1967 and signed by 'Omo Super' (Muehl) and 'Garth mit extra Fleischkraft' (Wiener), as program of the fictitious organisation Zealous Organization of Candied Knights. In April, it was spread during the Zock Exercises and the Zock-Fest in sparely 100 copies; in 1971, In 1971, the manifesto was published in Munich by Franz Knödel under the title Zock, Aspekte einer Totalrevolution
Where can we find this manifesto?
Which critic recognizes the work as a manifesto ? or: Typical characteristics of a manifesto Green, M. (ed.), Writings of the Vienna Actionists, Atlas Press, Londres, 1999.
Editorial comments: The text has been redescovered lately and is widely recognised as a manifesto. In his anthology, Green recognised as manifestos also some other texts of the artist: « Material Action Manifeste », « Die Destruktion » and « Das Intrem » ; Green, M. (ed.), Writings of the Vienna Actionists, Atlas Press, Londres, 1999, p. 78-79, 87.
Does the work corresponds to the definition of a manifesto? Yes
Does the work qualifies itself as a manifesto?
Is the signature individual, collective, or individual but in the name of a collective? Collective
Gender of the author(s): Male